You are here

Twenty Years After “Paradigms Regained,” Part 2: Responding to Margaret Barker’s Critics and Why Her Work Should Matter to Latter-day Saints

TitleTwenty Years After “Paradigms Regained,” Part 2: Responding to Margaret Barker’s Critics and Why Her Work Should Matter to Latter-day Saints
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2023
AuthorsChristensen, Kevin
JournalInterpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship
Volume55
Pagination31–106
KeywordsAsherah; Barker, Margaret; Criticism; Deuteronomist Reforms; Enoch (Prophet); Gospel of John; Nephi (Son of Lehi); Rhetoric; Temple Worship; Wisdom
Abstract

Here I address specific criticisms of Margaret Barker’s work. First, I set the stage by discussing Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions as a map and compass for navigating this kind of controversy. I show how his observations cast light on debates about Jesus in the Gospel of John, which in turn resemble present debates. In this context, I then consider some notable criticisms of Barker’s work as “not mainstream” and consider an instructive appreciation of Barker by Father John McDade in his “Life of Jesus Research.” I then respond in detail to a recent BYU Studies essay that was critical of Barker’s work.

URLhttps://journal.interpreterfoundation.org/twenty-years-after-paradigms-regained-part-2-responding-to-margaret-barkers-critics-and-why-her-work-should-matter-to-latter-day-saints/