You are here
Is There a Contradiction between Alma 7:10 and Matthew 2:5–6?
Title | Is There a Contradiction between Alma 7:10 and Matthew 2:5–6? |
Publication Type | Magazine Article |
Year of Publication | 1955 |
Authors | Smith, Joseph Fielding |
Magazine | Improvement Era |
Volume | 58 |
Issue Number | 4 |
Pagination | 222 |
Date Published | April 1955 |
Keywords | Alma (Book); Bethlehem; Gospel of Matthew; Intertextuality; Jerusalem (Old World); Jesus Christ, Birth of; Nativity |
Abstract | In answer to the title, this article states that there is no contradiction, arguing that Joseph Smith and all of his associates knew perfectly well that Bethlehem was where Jesus was born. The expression used in Alma 7:10 was not that Jesus was born in Jerusalem, but at Jerusalem. This is a Hebrew expression and simply refers to a geographical area—Jerusalem and environs, including Bethlehem. |
Terms of Use
Items in the BMC Archive are made publicly available for non-commercial, private use. Inclusion within the BMC Archive does not imply endorsement. Items do not represent the official views of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or of Book of Mormon Central.
Bibliographic Citation
Is There a Contradiction between Alma 7:10 and Matthew 2:5–6?" Improvement Era 58, no. 4 (1955): 222. "
Subscribe
Get the latest updates on Book of Mormon topics and research for free